STEAMSHIP LINE STORAGE OFFERINGS – Advantages and disadvantages

Compliance Alert

As the COVID-19 pandemic rages on, experts anticipate that the shipping industry could see a loss of $25-$30 billion this year. These losses would need to be at least partially offset or the landscape of global transportation could drastically change (i.e. bankruptcies, M&A).

The industry is waiting to see when container volume will begin to flow again. As cargo movement restrictions are lifted around the world, the disruption in the supply chain means storage space will continue to be at a premium. Millions of misplaced and held containers will be distributed to locations where they can finally be utilized.

In an effort to alleviate a severe lack of storage capacity at terminals and surrounding warehouses, steamship lines are beginning to offer cargo storage before, during, and after cargo has arrived at the final discharge port. These cargo storage programs vary by steamship line. While one program may require the delay in transit to be declared at the time of booking, another will allow it during transit. In addition, storage points are different depending on the size and location.

In order to make the best decision for your company, you need to be aware of the different options available for steamship line storage. Below we are providing information on the cost structure, as well as highlighting some of the advantages and disadvantages, of these “delay in transit” programs.

COST STRUCTURE

Demurrage, detention, per diem, and other charges can add up very quickly in the shipping industry. The cargo storage programs offered by some steamship lines can potentially save your business a lot of money. Generally, the pricing structure for these storage programs are on a tiered basis. There is an initial “free period” which lasts from 10-14 days. The second tier has a nominal fee (around $25-35 per day, per container) and the time frame fluctuates from carrier to carrier. The third tier cost usually doubles that from the second tier. It is important to note that each storage location may have diverse tiers and charges.

ADVANTAGES

Steamship lines are motivated by the customer demand, as well as the desire to keep the global supply chain fluid. There are multiple potential advantages of participating in a delay in transit program including:

● Cost Savings – The charges incurred on a daily basis are significantly lower than demurrage, detention, and per diem. This could save hundreds of dollars for the consignee.
● Strategic Movement – The cargo would begin to move to its final destination once the demand for it is known, allowing the steamship line to decrease its number of blank sailings.
● Force Majeure – The potential for force majeure is drastically reduced under these programs since the cargo is moving from a storage point to its final destination. This helps insulate against potentially costly diversion and delivery charges that occur with force majeure.

DISADVANTAGES

While the advantages of these storage programs are certainly worth consideration, there are also disadvantages that should be understood. These disadvantages which could cause strain on both costs and cargo availability include:

● No Guarantee of Costs – Even though the daily fees are lower, there is no cap to how much can accrue over time. With no monetary incentive, steamship lines could become unmotivated to rush the delivery of cargo. In addition, it is unknown when an importer would actually receive the goods under these programs.
● Port Congestion – Experts predict terminals may have capacity issues once cargo starts moving again. If the discharge terminal declares force majeure, cargo would have to be diverted.
● Charges Still Exist – While storing cargo under these programs does save money initially, the possibility of demurrage, detention, and per diem still exists once it arrives at the destination terminal.

Steamship lines are listening to their customers and working to provide options based on the feedback they receive. Today, perhaps more so than at any other time, it is prudent to know all the options available when it comes to moving and storing cargo. Before entering into a contractual agreement, it is wise to verify the offerings and criteria of the delay in transportation programs.

The experts at TLR are monitoring the global supply chain and cargo movement trends and activities on a daily basis. Please feel free to contact us with any questions at BD@shiptlr.com.

Table of Contents

Heather Kiesel

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »