The Section 301 Tariff Opportunity: Recovering China Duties Through Drawback 

Shipping container with Section 301 Tariff Opportunity text

Section 301 Duties and Drawback Eligibility 

The Section 301 tariffs imposed on Chinese goods represent one of the most significant duty recovery opportunities in recent memory. Unlike Section 232 duties on steel and aluminum, Section 301 duties ARE eligible for drawback. 

This means companies importing Chinese-origin goods subject to 7.5 percent, 25 percent, or even higher Section 301 tariff rates can recover up to 99 percent of those duties if the goods (or products made from them) are subsequently exported or destroyed. Given the magnitude of these tariffs, drawback has become a critical cost recovery tool. 

Industries Most Affected 

The industries hit hardest by Section 301 tariffs include semiconductors and electronic components, computer equipment, cut and sew apparel manufacturing, and battery and electric vehicle production. For companies in these sectors that export any portion of their products, drawback represents substantial recovery potential. 

Even companies that primarily sell domestically may have drawback opportunities through indirect exports, distribution to Canadian or international affiliates, or destruction of obsolete inventory. 

Calculating the Opportunity 

Consider a company importing $10 million annually in Chinese-origin components subject to 25 percent Section 301 duties—that’s $2.5 million in duties paid. If 40 percent of finished products are exported, the company may be eligible to recover approximately $990,000 annually (99 percent of $1 million in attributable duties). 

The five-year lookback period means companies just discovering drawback may have multiple years of unclaimed refunds available. At 25 percent duty rates, even modest export percentages generate meaningful recovery. 

Documentation Considerations 

Section 301 drawback requires the same documentation as any drawback claim—entry data showing duties paid, export documentation proving goods left the country, and evidence linking the two. For manufacturing drawback, bills of material documenting how imported components were incorporated into finished goods are also required. 

The key is ensuring your import data clearly identifies Section 301 duty payments. Work with your customs broker to confirm entries properly capture the applicable duty rates and amounts. 

Acting Before the Window Closes 

The five-year claim window means imports from 2021 and earlier are already ineligible. If your company has been paying Section 301 duties since 2018-2019 without claiming drawback, significant refunds have already been lost. 

Taking action now preserves remaining claims and establishes processes to capture future refunds. Given the magnitude of Section 301 rates, delaying drawback evaluation is increasingly expensive. 

About TLR Drawback Services 

TLR’s drawback team combines decades of specialized experience with modern technology to maximize duty recovery for our clients. From program evaluation through claim filing and payment, we handle the complexity so you can focus on your business. Contact us to explore your drawback opportunity.

Table of Contents

Taylor Wise

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »