Manufacturing Drawback for Shipyards and Heavy Industry 

An image depicting manufacturing drawback in a shipyard

Manufacturing Drawback Overview 

For shipyards, fabricators, and heavy industrial manufacturers, manufacturing drawback under 19 U.S.C. § 1313(a) and 1313(b) offers substantial duty recovery opportunities. When imported materials—steel plate, marine engines, electrical components, coatings—are incorporated into vessels or equipment that are subsequently exported, up to 99 percent of the duties paid on those materials can be recovered. 

This is particularly valuable for yards building vessels for foreign buyers or producing offshore equipment destined for international projects. With today’s elevated tariff environment, manufacturing drawback can represent millions of dollars in recoverable costs. 

How Manufacturing Drawback Differs 

Unlike unused merchandise drawback where goods are exported in the same condition as imported, manufacturing drawback applies when imported materials undergo a manufacturing process and become part of a new article. The finished product need not have a different tariff classification than the imported components—even minor processing can qualify if it constitutes “manufacture” under the regulations. 

The key distinction from other programs: you’re not exporting the imported goods themselves, but rather products that incorporate or are made from those imported goods. 

Rulings Requirements 

Before filing manufacturing drawback claims, you need either a Specific Manufacturing Ruling or must qualify under the General Manufacturing Ruling (T.D. 20-07). The General Ruling covers many common manufacturing scenarios and simplified the process significantly when TFTEA modernization took effect in 2019. 

A Specific Ruling is required for products not covered by the General Ruling or when you need to establish specific manufacturing processes and waste allowances. The ruling application requires detailed documentation of your manufacturing process, bills of material, and how imported components are incorporated into finished goods. 

Bill of Materials Requirements 

Manufacturing drawback requires detailed bills of material (BOMs) showing both the HTS classification and value of each imported component in your finished product. This documentation requirement is more rigorous than unused merchandise drawback and requires tight integration between customs, procurement, and production data. 

For shipyards, this means tracking imported steel, engines, electrical systems, and other components through production and linking them to specific vessel construction projects. The data requirements are substantial but so are the potential refunds. 

The FTA Limitation 

One significant limitation: manufacturing drawback on exports to Canada, Mexico, and Chile is subject to the “lesser of the two” rule. Only the lesser of the duties paid on import to the U.S. or the duties paid on import into the FTA country can be claimed. 

Since FTA countries often have duty-free treatment for goods qualifying under the trade agreement, this can effectively zero out manufacturing drawback for exports to those destinations. This doesn’t affect exports to non-FTA countries, which remain fully eligible for the 99 percent refund. 

About TLR Drawback Services 

TLR’s drawback team combines decades of specialized experience with modern technology to maximize duty recovery for our clients. From program evaluation through claim filing and payment, we handle the complexity so you can focus on your business. Contact us to explore your drawback opportunity. 

Table of Contents

Taylor Wise

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »