The Lesser of the Two Rule: Understanding FTA Limitations 

Feature image for “Understanding FTA Limitations” showing centered title text with the flags of Canada, Mexico, and Chile against a dark blue background representing trade relationships under free trade agreements.

The FTA Drawback Limitation 

When goods are exported to free trade agreement partners—Canada, Mexico, or Chile—drawback claims face a significant limitation known as the “lesser of the two” rule. This rule dramatically affects the economics of drawback for exports to these major trading partners and must be understood when evaluating drawback opportunities. 

The rule applies differently depending on whether you’re claiming unused merchandise or manufacturing drawback, and whether you’re using direct identification or substitution. 

Manufacturing Drawback to FTA Countries 

For manufacturing drawback on exports to Canada, Mexico, or Chile, only the “lesser of the two” import duties can be claimed—either the duty paid on import to the United States, or the duty paid on import into the FTA country. 

Since FTAs typically provide duty-free treatment for qualifying goods, the duty paid into the FTA country is often zero. Zero is less than whatever you paid importing into the U.S., so the “lesser of the two” is zero—effectively eliminating manufacturing drawback for FTA exports. 

This is why manufacturing drawback programs focused on FTA exports are generally not viable. The rule was specifically designed to prevent duty refunds that would undermine the trade agreement benefits. 

Unused Merchandise Direct ID to FTA Countries 

Unused merchandise drawback using direct identification to FTA countries is generally still available, but requires strict traceability. You must prove that the specific items exported are the same items that were imported—not just commercially interchangeable, but literally the same goods. 

This requires part number or serial number tracking through your entire supply chain, which many companies find operationally challenging. Without this level of traceability, unused merchandise exports to FTA countries may not qualify for drawback. 

Substitution Not Available for FTA Exports 

Here’s the critical limitation: substitution drawback is generally NOT available for exports to Canada, Mexico, or Chile. You cannot use HTS-based matching for FTA exports—only direct identification. 

This eliminates the flexibility that makes many drawback programs practical. If you can’t track specific imported items to specific exports, you likely can’t claim drawback on FTA shipments regardless of how much duty you’re paying. 

Strategic Implications 

The FTA limitations fundamentally shape drawback program design. Companies exporting primarily to Canada or Mexico will have different (and generally smaller) drawback opportunities than companies exporting to Europe, Asia, or other non-FTA destinations. 

When evaluating drawback potential, export destinations matter as much as export volumes. A company exporting 80% to Mexico may have less drawback opportunity than one exporting 30% to non-FTA countries, depending on product mix and traceability capabilities. 

About TLR Drawback Services 

TLR’s drawback team combines decades of specialized experience with modern technology to maximize duty recovery for our clients. From program evaluation through claim filing and payment, we handle the complexity so you can focus on your business. Contact us to explore your drawback opportunity. 

Table of Contents

Taylor Wise

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »