FDA Final Rule on Food Traceability Requirements for Certain Foods

FDA Food Traceability Final Rule

On December 7th, FDA presented a webinar on the new Final Rule for additional record requirements for the traceability of certain foods.  Excellent webinar, available on YouTube.  The presentation slides and the Final Rule are also below:

FDA Webinar on the Food Traceability Final Rule – YouTube

Presentation Slides – Webinar on the Food Traceability Final Rule (December 7, 2022) (fda.gov)

FSMA Final Rule: Requirements for Additional Traceability Records for Certain Foods | FDA

The rule covers certain cheeses, shell eggs, nut butters, fresh herbs, certain fresh fruits and vegetables, several types of fish, crustaceans, and mollusks, and ready-to-eat salads, for both domestic and imported foods.  Please see the webpage for the full Food Traceability List and for definitions and exemptions.  Note that if the food is merely an ingredient, it can still be covered. 

The Exemption Tool on the webpage goes over, for example, exemptions for the size of the business in terms of yearly sales, which are adjusted for inflation.  Certain foods and processing stages can have partial exemptions.

Covered persons in the supply chain (including for example, packers, holders, distributors, restaurants) will need to keep records of certain Key Data Elements (such as a Traceability Lot Code) and Critical Tracking Events depending on where a covered person fits in the supply chain and what operations have been performed on the food.  A Traceability Plan that describes internal procedures used to maintain the records is required.  In the event of an outbreak, the covered entity must furnish FDA with the requested elements within 24 hours in the form of an electronic sortable spreadsheet and any information needed to interpret it.

Records can also be kept by a third-party agent, for example, a customs broker.  But the covered entity is the responsible party.

Enforced Compliance for the Final Rule is planned for January 20, 2026.  So if you are a covered entity, you will want to start researching and shopping soon for possible recordkeeping software that fits your needs.  FDA does not prescribe a format for the records, so companies can maintain legible written or electronic records in any language.  However, a translation must be provided in a reasonable time period if FDA asks for a translation.

Recordkeeping compliance audits may be performed by FDA field offices but also by local, state and tribal authorities, all the way down to the restaurant and retail levels.

Covered entities should begin reviewing record transmission and retention with their suppliers and buyers now.  Under the Final Rule, confidentiality can be maintained, as the transmitter’s identity can be recorded as merely a job title, and not a specific person’s name.  A food facility registration number can also be used to ensure confidentiality. 

Table of Contents

Russell Chebahtah

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »