Common Drawback Mistakes and How to Avoid Them 

Feature image for “Common Drawback Mistakes and How to Avoid Them” showing centered title text over customs entry documents with a rejected stamp, representing errors and compliance issues in duty drawback claims.

Mistake 1: Ignoring the Five-Year Window 

The most expensive drawback mistake is simply waiting too long to start. Every day that passes, import entries age out of eligibility. Companies that delay drawback evaluation for “when things slow down” often discover years of refunds have already expired. 

The solution: evaluate drawback opportunity now. Even if implementation takes months, understanding your potential preserves the ability to act before more claims expire. 

Mistake 2: Assuming All Duties Qualify 

Not all duties are eligible for drawback. Companies sometimes build programs assuming they can recover antidumping duties, countervailing duties, or Section 232 duties—only to discover these are excluded. 

The solution: verify which specific duties you’re paying and confirm drawback eligibility before projecting recovery. Section 301 duties are eligible; Section 232 duties are not. The distinction matters enormously. 

Mistake 3: Underestimating Data Requirements 

Many companies assume their existing systems can support drawback, only to discover critical data gaps when implementation begins. Missing entry numbers, incomplete HTS classifications, or inadequate export documentation derail programs that looked promising on paper. 

The solution: conduct a thorough data assessment before committing to implementation. Request actual sample data, not assurances that data exists. Identify gaps and assess remediation costs realistically. 

Mistake 4: Overlooking the “Other-Other” Rule 

Substitution drawback depends on HTS matching, but not all HTS codes qualify. Products classified under “Other” provisions at both the 8-digit and 10-digit levels cannot use substitution—only direct identification. 

The solution: verify your HTS codes qualify for substitution before building a program around it. If key products fall into “Other-Other” classifications, you’ll need direct identification capabilities. 

Mistake 5: Neglecting FTA Limitations 

Companies heavily focused on Canadian or Mexican exports sometimes overestimate drawback potential. The “lesser of the two” rule and unavailability of substitution for FTA exports significantly limit recovery on shipments to these destinations. 

The solution: analyze export destinations, not just export volumes. A company with modest non-FTA exports may have more drawback opportunity than one shipping primarily to Mexico. 

Mistake 6: Poor Partner Selection 

Drawback is specialized work. Brokers without dedicated drawback expertise often underestimate complexity, provide poor guidance on program structure, and struggle with claim preparation and filing. 

The solution: work with partners who specialize in drawback, can demonstrate relevant experience, and have systems designed for drawback processing—not general-purpose tools adapted for occasional claims. 

About TLR Drawback Services 

TLR’s drawback team combines decades of specialized experience with modern technology to maximize duty recovery for our clients. From program evaluation through claim filing and payment, we handle the complexity so you can focus on your business. Contact us to explore your drawback opportunity

Table of Contents

Taylor Wise

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »