Destruction Drawback: Recovering Duties on Disposed Inventory 

Feature image for “Destruction Drawback: Recovering Duties on Disposed Inventory” showing centered title text over a blurred warehouse background with boxes, a clipboard, and discarded inventory representing goods removed from circulation.

What is Destruction Drawback? 

Not all imported goods are exported—some are destroyed. Destruction drawback allows recovery of duties on imported merchandise that is destroyed under CBP supervision rather than exported. Following TFTEA modernization, destruction and export are treated nearly interchangeably for drawback purposes, opening significant opportunities for companies with obsolete or damaged inventory. 

“Destruction” means the merchandise is rendered completely without commercial value. Simply disposing of goods isn’t sufficient—they must be destroyed in a manner that CBP can verify. 

Notice Requirements 

Unlike export drawback (where waivers eliminate notice requirements), destruction drawback typically requires a “Notice of Intent to Destroy” filed with CBP before destruction occurs. This gives CBP the opportunity to witness the destruction if they choose. 

In practice, CBP often waives the right to witness destruction, especially for established programs with good compliance histories. However, notice must always be provided—you cannot destroy goods and claim drawback retroactively without proper notification. 

Scrap Value Adjustments 

When destruction generates scrap with commercial value, that value must be deducted from the drawback calculation. For example: if aluminum cans are imported at $0.07 each and destroyed through recycling that yields $0.41 per pound in aluminum scrap value, the scrap value is subtracted from the import value before calculating the refund. 

This adjustment ensures drawback refunds accurately reflect the net duty burden on goods that were ultimately valueless to the claimant. Proper scrap value documentation is essential for compliance. 

Common Destruction Scenarios 

Destruction drawback is valuable in several scenarios: expired or obsolete inventory that cannot be sold, damaged goods with no commercial value, product recalls requiring destruction, manufacturing waste (when waste contains dutiable imported materials), and samples or prototypes that serve no ongoing purpose. 

For companies with significant inventory turnover, particularly in industries with short product lifecycles, destruction drawback can recover substantial duties on goods that would otherwise be written off entirely. 

Documentation Requirements 

Destruction drawback requires documentation proving: the goods were imported and duties paid (standard import entry data), the goods were destroyed (destruction certificates, recycling receipts), the destroyed goods correspond to claimed imports (matching evidence), and any scrap value (if applicable). 

Many destruction facilities provide certificates documenting what was destroyed, when, and any recovered value. These certificates, combined with internal inventory records linking destroyed goods to import entries, support destruction drawback claims. 

About TLR Drawback Services 

TLR’s drawback team combines decades of specialized experience with modern technology to maximize duty recovery for our clients. From program evaluation through claim filing and payment, we handle the complexity so you can focus on your business. Contact us to explore your drawback opportunity. 

Table of Contents

Taylor Wise

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »