COVID-19’s Impact on Global Trade

Compliance Alert

As you are aware, the current global environment is in a constant state of flux due to the rapidly developing measures being taken to curb the spread of COVID-19. At TLR, we are doing our best to stay atop the domestic and international restrictions on movement having an effect on commerce.

Currently, air freight has sustained the most substantial impact of the virus response, as many airlines have severely reduced or even cancelled passenger flights to Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and the Middle East. Cargo flights are still operating, in some cases also in a reduced capacity, and demand has increased sharply. In response, airlines have implemented surcharges, in some cases exceeding 50%, or are requiring all cargo to move via priority or express service at higher rates. As yet, there have been no restrictions placed on domestic travel within the U.S., however we are watching closely for updates.

For the most part, ocean freight is still moving as usual. However, we have seen some terminal closures in Seattle and Los Angeles due to a decrease in throughput. This is putting some additional strain on the terminals that remain open, causing some delays and disruptions. There is also a shortage of equipment caused by the lack of cargo coming in from Asia, specifically China, resulting in an increasing difficulty finding suitable containers for all manner of goods. Unless and until imports begin to increase, this is going to become a severely limiting factor for export.

As of now, there have been no outright restrictions on cargo movement throughout the major markets. While many EU borders are closing to individual or civilian traffic, they remain open for cargo crossing, though experiencing sometimes significant delays. We urge you to follow up with your customers to confirm their status, as we have had reports of businesses shutting down for the foreseeable future. While we understand the urge to expedite as many shipments as possible, we caution you to consider the possibility that cargo may become “stuck” should restrictions tighten further or a business closure is mandated prior to receipt.

TLR will work diligently to help you plan for – and support you through – any contingency. With the upheaval in businesses realigning to work remotely and carrier responses slowing considerably in recent days, we do want to advise you that there may be potential for delays in response or action. Please know that we are working to mitigate these delays and maintain as much efficiency as possible. Thank you for your understanding and patience during this challenging and uncertain time.

We will continue to provide updates as we receive them. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact your customer service representative or e-mail BD@shiptlr.com.

Table of Contents

Heather Kiesel

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »