CARGO INSURANCE – Your defense against unexpected and costly circumstances

Compliance Alert

Cargo insurance is one component of the supply chain that is often misunderstood. Many companies rely on coverage that is provided by the supplier or carrier and naively assume they are adequately protected. While there is nothing inherently wrong with this, understanding the terms and conditions of your policy is paramount.

Please consider the following facets of cargo insurance when choosing which policy is right for you:

● Cargo Insurance from the Supplier – Insurance from the supplier is often the most economical policy available. However, the benefits generally cover the best interests of the supplier. Since the minimum amount of coverage is applied, it leaves the buyer at greater risk than with other types of insurance.

● Carrier Insurance – The liability is very limited when carrier insurance is purchased. If cargo is damaged, it must be proven that negligence on the part of the carrier occurred. In the event of a claim, an adjuster will be assigned by the steamship line. Even if damage is discovered, the amount of compensation to the insured will be minimal. Some carriers now offer “protection plans”. These are not insurance plans, but rather a set amount of money provided to the beneficiary if damage occurs. Even though the monetary distribution is higher than carrier liability, it is still not near the coverage cargo insurance provides.

● Claims – Should there be a claim, supplier cargo insurance will be investigated and mitigated using the laws of the supplier’s country. In addition, an adjuster will be appointed by the foreign insurer. The same applies with carrier insurance, leaving the consignee with no local advocate.

A strong cargo insurance policy is one that will provide peace of mind to the insured which only comes with maximized coverage at a competitive rate. The value of analyzing your policy is imperative to ensuring an adequate level of coverage across the whole of your supply chain. Ideally the vast majority of cargo should be covered by all risk insurance. “All risk” insurance covers everything the policy does not explicitly state as an exemption. The protection should be warehouse to warehouse – meaning the product is protected from the time it leaves the supplier to the time it arrives at the consignee’s location. In the unfortunate event of a claim, as the policy holder your insurance representative should work as your personal advocate, saving you time and money.

In addition, verifying that general average protection is included in your policy is vital to avoiding an extremely costly bill from a carrier. For those unaware, “general average” is a principle of maritime law whereby all stakeholders in an ocean voyage proportionally share any losses resulting from a voluntary sacrifice of cargo, or even parts of the ship, to “save the voyage” in an emergency. An example is where containers are thrown overboard to right the ship in a storm at sea. A general average claim is usually extremely expensive and far above the value of your cargo. When general average is declared, the cargo owner is required to post a cash deposit prior to the release of the goods if there is no policy in place to cover it. For those with their own policies your insurance company should pay this expense and ideally process the claim utilizing a certified adjustor using U.S. laws.

It is very possible force majeure may be declared by the steamship line or freight forwarder given the recent trend of the global shipping community. While force majeure may not be specifically named in the policy, additional freight charges for the purpose of completing delivery, as well as other potential associated costs, may be paid by cargo insurers. Your cargo insurance policy generally has terms and conditions to cover costs relating to minimizing loss or damage and ensuring cargo arrives safely to its intended destination.

As previously mentioned, there are strict limitations in place for supplier cargo insurance and carrier liability. If, after reviewing your current cargo insurance policy or one provided by the supplier, you identify gaps in coverage, TLR would be pleased to offer suggestions to ensure adequate levels of coverage based on your international business footprint. For reference, the policy offered by TLR provides the cost for cargo replacement, additional shipping, claims and related charges, general average protection, as well as an advocate to work on your behalf utilizing Lloyd’s of London adjustors using U.S. laws.

Cargo insurance is a necessity for transporting goods. As it can be difficult to understand the types of products available, please feel free to contact TLR at BD@shiptlr.com with any questions relating to cargo insurance.

Table of Contents

Heather Kiesel

News & Updates

Related Posts

Client alert graphic about new CBP vetting requirements for foreign Importers of Record, featuring customs, shipping, air freight, and compliance imagery.

Client Alert: Foreign Importers of Record – New CBP Vetting Requirements Are Coming

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has provided additional information regarding implementation of Executive Order 14411, “Strengthening Customs Enforcement,” signed June 3, 2026. The Executive Order directs significant changes to the requirements for Importers of Record (IORs), including heightened requirements for foreign IORs. TLR is a CTPAT-validated customs broker (CVCB) and is preparing for these changes. Foreign IOR clients should begin preparing as well. What Is Changing for Foreign IORs? Under Executive Order 14411, foreign IORs making formal entry into the United States will be required to either: CBP is now providing additional insight into

Read More »
Graphic for the BIS and DDTC transfer of certain firearm suppressors from ITAR to the EAR, featuring a suppressor, cargo ship, port crane, and U.S. government building.

Client Alert : BIS and DDTC Transfer Certain Firearm Suppressors from ITAR to the EAR

On July 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce published complementary Interim Final Rules that significantly change the export controls applicable to certain firearm suppressors, also referred to as silencers or mufflers. Effective November 20, 2026, many suppressors currently controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations will instead be controlled under the Export Administration Regulations. The changes are intended to reduce regulatory burdens while maintaining export controls through the Commerce Control List. What Is Changing? Certain Suppressors Move From ITAR to the EAR The Department of State is

Read More »
Logistics icons with the text IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: CIT Hearing Provides New Details on CAPE Expansion

The Court of International Trade (CIT) held another hearing on June 9, 2026, regarding the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund process. The hearing followed the court’s prior order requiring the government to explain why the CIT should not lift the stay of its earlier orders directing refunds of unlawfully collected IEEPA duties. While the court did not lift the stay at the hearing, the proceedings provided important updates regarding U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) refund processing efforts and the next planned phases of the CAPE refund system. CBP Continues to Process Refunds Through CAPE CBP

Read More »
Image of logistics icons for IEEPA Tariff related update

IEEPA Tariff Refund Update: Government Signals Appeal of Refund Order

Recent developments in the ongoing IEEPA tariff refund litigation may significantly impact how importers pursue recovery of tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion in the Court of International Trade (CIT) that provided important insight into the government’s position regarding future IEEPA tariff refunds. While the motion itself sought to prevent CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott from testifying before the court, the filing also clarified the government’s intended approach to refunds and confirmed its plan to appeal portions of the

Read More »